Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zatopeks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, based on consensus that the subject and album fail to qualify notability guidelines. Keegan^talk 06:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zatopeks

Completing unfinished nom for Beeblbrox (talk · contribs), apparently Twinkle choked. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unbiased Delete to the artist and album, neither of which appear to be notable per WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 05:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per [1] Sputnikmusic is somewhat reliable, as is, minorly, [2] jersey beat. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 05:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 05:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Last.fm has very few plays, and doesn't seem to be notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asenine (talk • contribs)

""Keep"". They are a notable UK band, relevant to US labels that have worked with them. Also, sources such as Last FM or similar are not always reliable in the punk genre. - JoeThird —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeThird (talk • contribs) 14:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, the nom shows up. Sorry all, had problems with my ISP. The otters put it as well as I could've anyway. Beeblbrox (talk) 05:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete - no proof of any notability whatsoever. They opened for Tuuli? So did my co-worker's daughter! In fact, I have a friend who necked with Courtney Love twice, is Sarah McLachlan's first cousin, and appeared in a movie with Michael Ironside. Meanwhile these guys have done some split-releases, and compilations on non-notable labels, played shows here and there, and that seems to be it. There are no reliable sources. Utterly fails WP:N. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom.Clearly fails WP:N Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Fails WP:N, but most likely because it's punk. Mark article requiring sources. ChessCreator (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If you sincerely feel that the article fails notability criteria, then shouldn't your !vote be delete? Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 04:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.